Remember that a Windows user might be a member of more than one
Windows group (e.g. both Engineers, and Managers). Permissions granted
or denied to the Engineers login, to the Managers login, granted or
denied to the user individually, and granted or denied to roles that
the user is a member of, will all be aggregated and evaluated to for
the effective permissions.
If windows group is added as login and given db_owner permission on couple of dbs.
And then one of the members of this group (say domainnameUserA) is added as a login with only public role (at server and db level).
I know that denials override the grants. But does giving public permission inherently result in any denials?
In other words, what is the effective permission for this user (domainnameUserA)? Is it only public or does it retain the db_owner permissions?
Permissions can only be denied by an explicit
From the Docs
DENYdenies a permission to a principal. Prevents that principal from inheriting the permission through its group or role memberships.
As a result, granting permissions via membership in any group does not take away any permissions. Grants are always additive, that is they are in-addition to the already existing permissions the security principal has.
So, to answer your question, membership in the public role does not prevent permissions assigned via group membership from having effect. In the scenario mentioned in your question, the user would have
db_owner permissions via their membership in the group that has been granted membership in that role.